Nigerian Governors’ Forum Silence: Neutrality Amid Rivers State Emergency
ABUJA — The Nigerian Governors’ Forum (NGF) has come under scrutiny for its neutral stance on President Bola Tinubu’s controversial declaration of a six-month state of emergency in Rivers State. The NGF explained that its decision to remain silent stems from the need to avoid divisive positions that could alienate members with varying political affiliations.
Why the Silence?
Director-General of the NGF, Asishana Okauru, clarified that the forum’s neutrality is rooted in its commitment to unity among governors across party lines. He stated:
“The NGF must remain a platform for collaboration and dialogue, not division. Taking partisan positions on contentious issues risks undermining the very essence of the forum.”
This approach reflects lessons learned from past divisions within the NGF, which weakened its influence on national matters.
The Rivers State Emergency: A Divisive Topic
President Tinubu’s declaration of emergency rule in Rivers State has sparked widespread debate. The decision led to the suspension of Governor Siminalayi Fubara, his deputy, and the State House of Assembly, with Vice Admiral Ibok-Ete Ibas (retd.) appointed as Sole Administrator.
While Tinubu cited pipeline vandalism and political instability as reasons for the emergency rule, critics argue that the move is unconstitutional and politically motivated.
- South-South Governors Forum: Strongly opposed the declaration, stating that it does not meet constitutional criteria outlined in Section 305(3) of the Nigerian Constitution.
- PDP Governors Forum: Condemned the action as a threat to democracy and accused Tinubu of targeting opposition-led states.
- Political Scientists: Called for legal scrutiny of the emergency declaration to ensure constitutionality and avoid administrative overreach.
NGF’s Role in National Unity
The NGF’s decision to remain neutral underscores its role as a unifying body for governors across Nigeria’s geopolitical zones. By avoiding partisan conflicts, the forum aims to facilitate dialogue and cooperation on broader national issues such as security, economic reforms, and governance.
Despite criticism from some quarters, Okauru emphasized that neutrality allows the NGF to mediate disputes without bias or prejudice.
Public Reaction
The NGF’s silence has drawn mixed reactions:
- Supporters: Argue that neutrality preserves unity among governors and prevents further polarization.
- Critics: Believe that silence on critical national issues undermines accountability and leadership.
Conclusion
As debates around Rivers State’s emergency rule continue, the NGF’s neutral stance highlights the delicate balance between fostering unity among governors and addressing contentious national issues. Whether this approach strengthens or weakens its influence remains to be seen.
